Blackmagic multidock bootcamp7/7/2023 ![]() The Thunderbay-4 can offer some decent RAID speeds for a spinning drive setup, and very high capacity, but. The Thunderbay-4 is intended for use with mechanical spinning hard drives (although it may be possible to kludge together a solution that allows 2.5" SSDs to fit in the 3.5" bays). If you're looking at the OWC Thunderbay-4 as opposed to the Thunderbay-Mini, you may have missed the fact that the Thunderbay-4 uses standard, full-sized 3.5" drives, and NOT the 2.5" form factor that SSD's come in. On paper, Thunderbay seems faster, cheaper, and greater storage, though most people seem to go with Blackmagic. Any help in this is greatly appreciated!īlackmagic with a bunch of Samsung EVOs or Thunderbay with 20TB of OWC-provided drives? This will be used only for sample streaming. I also readily welcome any suggestions on other equipment (drives, docks, or otherwise) that weren't mentioned here. Does anyone have any experience with the drives that come with the Thunderbay? Or know what they are? If they’re bad and I’d need to get the Samsungs anyway, then that price advantage for it disappears.Īlso, this setup will be solely for sample streaming. Though, I couldn’t see anywhere which drives they use when you choose that option. Also, if you get it configured to 20TB using drives that OWC provides, it’s roughly $1400 less than the Blackmagic setup I’m considering (along with providing a buttload more storage). On their website, the read speed listed for the Thunderbay (nearly 800mb/s) is much higher than speed listed for Blackmagic (>500mb/s). On paper, it seems like Thunderbay has the advantage. Is this mostly because of the noise that the Thunderbay makes? I’ve seen bits of comparison between the two in various threads, and it seems that most people go with Blackmagic. But since the MultiDock 10G uses SATA 3 (6 Gbps) based connections to the actual drives themselves, the maximum throughput possible to a single drive is even lower, usually around 500 MB/s maximum after accounting for SATA interface overhead (and could be less depending on the drive).I’m wanting to upgrade my hard drive setup entirely, and I’m primarily deciding between getting a Blackmagic Multidock with 2 x Samsung 850 EVO 2TB and 2 x Samsung 850 EVO 1TB or a OWC Thunderbay 4. USB 3.1 Gen 2 bus speeds are 10 Gbps (1250 MB/s) at the interface level, but due to overhead and other issues, real world maximum performance you can expect at the port level is around 900 MB/s or so. Sometimes this is due to connection related issues and disconnecting and reconnecting the cable improves things.Įven with USB 3.1 Gen 2 speeds, things are never going to be as fast through the MultiDock 10G as with the internal SSD. ![]() I've also seen situations where USB 3 capable ports don't always negotiate USB 3 speeds (even when using a USB 3 compatible cable). For example, a lot of USB-C cables designed for charging purposes only support USB 2.0 data speeds as they lack the additional data wires internally to support USB 3 data transfers. Usually the causes of this are some kind of cable or port issue. Although USB 2.0 has a maximum interface bandwidth of 480 Mbps (60 MB/s), due to interface overhead (and a few other factors), have real world transfer speeds in the range of 35 to 40 MB/s, which seems to be inline with what you are seeing. It sounds like the MultiDock 10G is only connected to the computer using USB 2.0 speeds (480 Mbps) rather than USB 3.1 Gen 2 speeds (10 Gbps).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |